we_are_coded.by CODE · The world, decoded
БГ

Who is who

Perplexity

An AI search engine that doesn't throw ten links at you to pick from. It gives you a ready answer and shows where it got it from - and you decide whether to trust it.

Updated on 13 July 2026 · Checked on 13 July 2026

In short

In short: Perplexity is a search engine that doesn't give you a list of sites to dig through, but a direct answer with sources listed underneath. You ask something, it searches the web in real time and gives you back written text with links to where it got each claim. It's positioning itself as a rival to Google in the discipline of search itself, not just to ChatGPT in conversation.

In practice it looks like this: you type a question like in Google, but instead of a blue strip with ten results you get three or four sentences that directly tell you the answer, with small numbered references next to them pointing to the sites each sentence came from. You click the number, open the source, check if it's true. Searching and reading the results merge into one action instead of two.

It was founded in 2022 by Aravind Srinivas (CEO) and three co-founders, former engineers from Google and OpenAI (the company behind ChatGPT). It's private, doesn't belong to any single big tech giant - it's funded by investors, and it was valued at around $22.6 billion in its latest funding round.

It's used by people tired of opening five articles to piece together one answer - students, journalists, anyone checking a fact fast who wants to see where it comes from. Since February 2026 the company dropped the ad model and moved entirely to subscription, with the explanation that ads in the answers erode trust in the answer itself. Honestly, that's the first thing Perplexity did that made me trust them a little more.

The difference from regular search isn't cosmetic. Google gives you raw material and leaves you to judge for yourself. Perplexity has already chewed the raw material for you - convenient, until you forget to check whether the chewing was done right. That's exactly why the little numbers under the text aren't decoration, they're the only way to check whether the machine is making things up with confidence.

Google gives you raw material and leaves you to judge for yourself. Perplexity has already chewed it for you - the question is whether the chewing was done right.

Here's what you're buying

A tool that saves you the digging is great - until you stop checking the links under the answer, because they were there and it sounded confident. A confident tone and true content are two different things, and that's exactly the difference Perplexity is counting on you not noticing.

A reference desk that points you to the right shelf with a smile is useful. If instead it starts reading you the book itself and expects you to believe it unconditionally - that's a different thing. I check the little numbers. I'd recommend you do too.

The visual is generated code-art, no third-party images.